🏘️ From Advice to Dinner

🎯 Proposed purpose

Close the gap between “eat more vegetables” and dinner on the table, by combining a short conversation about what matters to the person, an honest look at their kitchen circumstances, hands-on food-skills teaching, and follow-up that checks whether the promised support arrived. Kitchen Monk™ recipes start whole-food plant-based and free of added salt, oil and sugar, while meeting each person where they are.

👥 Intended participants

Adults who have received nutrition advice and want practical help using it, and the family members or caregivers who cook with them. The specific group, eligibility and any clinical referral pathway would be agreed with a host organisation and its clinicians before anything begins.

🗓️ Example session sequence (illustrative only)

1. Welcome and priorities: what each person wants to make easier (Care Workflow stages 1–2).
2. Kitchen circumstances: selected Soil questions on equipment, time, budget and access (stage 3).
3. Hands-on skill: adapt one familiar meal; practise one preparation skill (stage 4).
4. Shared plan: each person chooses one action; the team records its promised support (stages 5–6).
5. Follow-up: what was tried, what helped, whether support arrived, what to change (stage 7).

The number, length and format of sessions would be set with the host and adjusted for the participants.

♿ Accessibility planning

• Step-free venue access, seating for preparation, and adaptive kitchen tools where needed.
• Large-print and plain-language materials; interpretation or translated materials as required.
• Recipes adapted for cultural preferences, budgets, and limited equipment.
• Video alternatives with captions where available; printable versions for low-connectivity homes.
• Food-allergy and dietary-restriction procedures agreed in advance with clinicians.

🤝 Team functions

Actual responsibilities depend on education, competence, jurisdiction, employer policy, supervision and the service agreement. See the nursing role directory.

🧰 Resource requirements (to be confirmed)

• A host site with a teaching kitchen or safe demonstration space, food-safety approval and insurance.
• Ingredients, equipment, printed materials and accessibility supports.
• Staff or volunteer time for teaching, coordination and follow-up.
• A private, approved place to record shared plans (not this website).
• An agreed budget and evaluation plan.

🔁 Follow-up process

Each participant’s shared plan names a follow-up arrangement. At follow-up the team asks what was tried, what helped, what was difficult, whether promised support arrived, and what should change, then agrees to continue, adapt, refer or stop. Support delivered is recorded separately from support offered. See the follow-up record.

📊 Evaluation questions

• Feasibility: Can the service be delivered as planned with available staff, space and budget?
• Participation: Who took part, and who was missing?
• Delivery: What proportion of promised support was delivered on time?
• Skills: Did participants gain the preparation skills they chose?
• Experience and burden: How acceptable was it, and what did it cost participants and staff?
• Costs: What resources did it require?

A first pilot can test feasibility and delivery. It cannot establish clinical effectiveness. See evidence and evaluation status.

📍 Current development status

Last reviewed November 7, 2026.

🙋 Ways to help shape it

Choose the route that fits you. Each goes to a short form on one page.